Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The CESTAT adjudicated on various demands and penalties imposed on the appellants. The key findings are: The demand on account of undervaluation of goods cleared to two non-existent dealers was upheld along with interest and penalty equal to duty. The benefit of exemption notification was denied proportionately for traded goods, and the matter was remanded for re-quantification. The substantial demand for alleged clandestine removal of Fatty Acid in the guise of Refined Palm Oil was set aside due to lack of evidence. The penalties imposed on the directors were reduced considering their roles and the offenses established.
The CESTAT adjudicated on various demands and penalties imposed on the appellants. The key findings are: The demand on account of undervaluation of goods cleared to two non-existent dealers was upheld along with interest and penalty equal to duty. The benefit of exemption notification was denied proportionately for traded goods, and the matter was remanded for re-quantification. The substantial demand for alleged clandestine removal of Fatty Acid in the guise of Refined Palm Oil was set aside due to lack of evidence. The penalties imposed on the directors were reduced considering their roles and the offenses established.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
