Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The High Court held that the mere pendency of an appeal before the Supreme Court against the CESTAT order would not entitle the Revenue Department to insist on provisional assessment of the imported goods. Since there was no stay on the CESTAT order classifying the goods under CTH 851770, the Petitioner shall be entitled to seek release of goods as per the CESTAT order, subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court and compliance with any directions issued therein. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.
The High Court held that the mere pendency of an appeal before the Supreme Court against the CESTAT order would not entitle the Revenue Department to insist on provisional assessment of the imported goods. Since there was no stay on the CESTAT order classifying the goods under CTH 851770, the Petitioner shall be entitled to seek release of goods as per the CESTAT order, subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court and compliance with any directions issued therein. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
