Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held that the mere pendency of an appeal before the Supreme Court against the CESTAT order would not entitle the Revenue Department to insist on provisional assessment of the imported goods. Since there was no stay on the CESTAT order classifying the goods under CTH 851770, the Petitioner shall be entitled to seek release of goods as per the CESTAT order, subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court and compliance with any directions issued therein. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.
The High Court held that the mere pendency of an appeal before the Supreme Court against the CESTAT order would not entitle the Revenue Department to insist on provisional assessment of the imported goods. Since there was no stay on the CESTAT order classifying the goods under CTH 851770, the Petitioner shall be entitled to seek release of goods as per the CESTAT order, subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court and compliance with any directions issued therein. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
