Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The appellant was held not liable to pay service tax on discounts and incentives received from the manufacturer, as these related to sale and purchase of goods (cars, spare parts, and accessories) and not rendition of any service. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals, as the provisions of the Finance Act cannot be made applicable to such transactions between the appellant, manufacturer, and customers involving transfer of goods. The discounts and incentives offered by the manufacturer were in relation to sale and purchase of goods, passed on to the ultimate consumers, and did not constitute any service rendered by the appellant.
The appellant was held not liable to pay service tax on discounts and incentives received from the manufacturer, as these related to sale and purchase of goods (cars, spare parts, and accessories) and not rendition of any service. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals, as the provisions of the Finance Act cannot be made applicable to such transactions between the appellant, manufacturer, and customers involving transfer of goods. The discounts and incentives offered by the manufacturer were in relation to sale and purchase of goods, passed on to the ultimate consumers, and did not constitute any service rendered by the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.