Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    IRRA platform discontinued as enhanced broker continuity measures and contingency trading facilities made it redundant.
    Foreign exchange authorisation framework rationalised with new compliance rules for authorised persons under FEMA.
    Export of services confirmed for university consultancy work; incidental student support did not make the supplier an intermediary.
    Proceedings against a non-existent amalgamated company are void; section 87 cannot validate post-merger GST action.
    Natural justice in revocation of registration proceedings requires a fair chance to reply before a fresh order is made.
    Unsigned assessment orders are invalid; writ delay may be excused for patent defects, with remand after hearing.
    Parallel GST proceedings on the same subject matter must be coordinated to avoid multiple adjudicatory processes.
    Jurisdictional defect in assessment where the same officers issued audit observations and later passed the ex parte orders.
    Ex parte tax adjudication quashed for lack of hearing and non-speaking order; matter remitted for fresh adjudication.
    Strict construction of penalty provisions bars penalty for lower-rate sales tax payment without any turnover mismatch.
    Parallel GST proceedings barred only for the same distinct infraction; assessment quashed for failure to examine overlap.
    Substantive compliance for section 115BAA allowed; procedural delay in filing Form No. 10-IC could not defeat the concessional regime.
    Reassessment cannot rest on material already examined; reopening on the same interest income mismatch was quashed for lack of fresh information.
    Bona fide belief on capital gains treatment constituted reasonable cause, so audit penalty was deleted.
    Commercial expediency justified medical reimbursement to a key employee-director, making the company's expense deductible.
    Penalty limitation under section 275(1)(c): ITAT held time runs from the Assessing Officer's reference, quashing the penalty.
    Treaty-rate relief for dividend distribution tax and allowance of corporate club membership as business expenditure
    Depreciation on goodwill allowed where the amendment excluding goodwill was held prospective and inapplicable to the year in question.
    Binding interim judicial directions protected the assessee from TDS default and consequential interest on leave travel concession payments.
    Consequential penalty under section 271(1)(c) fails when the underlying quantum addition has already been deleted.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Central Excise

The appellant Kaizen Organics Pvt. Ltd. was found guilty of...

Company's Fraudulent CENVAT Credit Claims Exposed; Tribunal Upholds Duty Recovery, Interest, and Penalties.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Central Excise December 13, 2024 Case Laws AT
The appellant Kaizen Organics Pvt. Ltd. was found guilty of fraudulently availing CENVAT credit and cash refund by showing fictitious manufacturing of excisable goods purportedly supplied to them by Koolmint. The Tribunal held that there was no credible evidence of actual manufacturing activity by Koolmint, and the claims of electricity consumption from DG sets lacked merit. The entire transaction appeared to be a sham to wrongfully avail duty benefits. Section 11D of the Central Excise Act was rightly invoked to recover Rs. 95,60,962 collected by Koolmint under the guise of excise duty. The extended period of limitation was correctly applied as the fraud vitiated all statutory records ab initio. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Commissioner's order demanding duty, interest and penalties.

Topics

Acts Income Tax