Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and order appointing an arbitrator u/s 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It held that the dispute regarding non-payment of wages and the legality of the termination order was non-arbitrable as it fell under the jurisdiction of the statutory authorities under the Payment of Wages Act. The alleged violation of the non-disclosure obligation was an afterthought not raised in the show cause notice, inquiry report, or termination order, rendering it non-existent. Consequently, the respondent's petition u/s 11(6) was dismissed.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and order appointing an arbitrator u/s 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It held that the dispute regarding non-payment of wages and the legality of the termination order was non-arbitrable as it fell under the jurisdiction of the statutory authorities under the Payment of Wages Act. The alleged violation of the non-disclosure obligation was an afterthought not raised in the show cause notice, inquiry report, or termination order, rendering it non-existent. Consequently, the respondent's petition u/s 11(6) was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
