Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The High Court set aside the show cause notice and summary issued by the respondent u/s 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for multiple financial years spanning January 2018 to August 2022. Relying on the coordinate bench judgment in M/S. VEREMAX TECHNOLOGIE SERVICES LIMITED, the Court held that the respondent erred in issuing a consolidated show cause notice for multiple assessment years from 2017-18 to 2020-21. Though the summary segregated liabilities for each financial year, the Court found it inappropriate. The respondent was granted liberty to issue separate show cause notices for each financial year and proceed against the petitioner accordingly.
The High Court set aside the show cause notice and summary issued by the respondent u/s 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for multiple financial years spanning January 2018 to August 2022. Relying on the coordinate bench judgment in M/S. VEREMAX TECHNOLOGIE SERVICES LIMITED, the Court held that the respondent erred in issuing a consolidated show cause notice for multiple assessment years from 2017-18 to 2020-21. Though the summary segregated liabilities for each financial year, the Court found it inappropriate. The respondent was granted liberty to issue separate show cause notices for each financial year and proceed against the petitioner accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
