Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The High Court held that the solar plant was put to use for the purpose of business on 20.03.2013 when it started generating electricity, despite being non-functional initially due to defects. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on the solar plant from the financial year 2012-13 itself, even though synchronization with the grid took place on 20.04.2013 in the subsequent financial year 2013-14. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.
The High Court held that the solar plant was put to use for the purpose of business on 20.03.2013 when it started generating electricity, despite being non-functional initially due to defects. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on the solar plant from the financial year 2012-13 itself, even though synchronization with the grid took place on 20.04.2013 in the subsequent financial year 2013-14. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
