Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The High Court held that the solar plant was put to use for the purpose of business on 20.03.2013 when it started generating electricity, despite being non-functional initially due to defects. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on the solar plant from the financial year 2012-13 itself, even though synchronization with the grid took place on 20.04.2013 in the subsequent financial year 2013-14. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.
The High Court held that the solar plant was put to use for the purpose of business on 20.03.2013 when it started generating electricity, despite being non-functional initially due to defects. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on the solar plant from the financial year 2012-13 itself, even though synchronization with the grid took place on 20.04.2013 in the subsequent financial year 2013-14. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
