Declared value for used garments needs reliable comparables; restricted second-hand imports without licence may still attract confiscation and moderat...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2801 to 2820 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal held that late filing fee u/s 234E was not leviable on the assessee. The assessee had filed the relevant return within the due date on 22.10.2021, which was acknowledged by the Central Processing Centre. The subsequent filing on 26.07.2022 was due to a technical glitch on the department's portal to facilitate issuance of TDS certificates for clients. The Tribunal ruled that the return filed on 22.10.2021 cannot be ignored, and late filing fee cannot be levied on the return filed on 26.07.2022. Consequently, the late filing fee imposed was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The Tribunal held that late filing fee u/s 234E was not leviable on the assessee. The assessee had filed the relevant return within the due date on 22.10.2021, which was acknowledged by the Central Processing Centre. The subsequent filing on 26.07.2022 was due to a technical glitch on the department's portal to facilitate issuance of TDS certificates for clients. The Tribunal ruled that the return filed on 22.10.2021 cannot be ignored, and late filing fee cannot be levied on the return filed on 26.07.2022. Consequently, the late filing fee imposed was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
