Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The High Court set aside the impugned order/communication dated 16 January 2024, revoking the No Objection Certificate (NOC) to operate from all ports and for trade license to facilitate handling hazardous waste oil discharge, garbage, and scrap at JSW Jaigad Port. The revocation order suffered from violation of principles of natural justice as no show cause notice was issued, no opportunity of hearing was granted, and the order lacked reasons, merely stating violation of Customs Act, 1962 and Rules without specifying the alleged violations committed by the petitioner. Consequently, the petition was allowed.
The High Court set aside the impugned order/communication dated 16 January 2024, revoking the No Objection Certificate (NOC) to operate from all ports and for trade license to facilitate handling hazardous waste oil discharge, garbage, and scrap at JSW Jaigad Port. The revocation order suffered from violation of principles of natural justice as no show cause notice was issued, no opportunity of hearing was granted, and the order lacked reasons, merely stating violation of Customs Act, 1962 and Rules without specifying the alleged violations committed by the petitioner. Consequently, the petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.