Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The Tribunal held that the original adjudicating authority had erred in denying the opportunity of cross-examination to the respondent during the adjudication proceedings, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. Consequently, the matter was remanded back to the original authority to reconsider the case after allowing the cross-examination of the Director of M/s Auspicious Ornaments. The Tribunal found no error in the direction given by the first appellate authority for remanding the matter, and hence, the appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed.
The Tribunal held that the original adjudicating authority had erred in denying the opportunity of cross-examination to the respondent during the adjudication proceedings, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. Consequently, the matter was remanded back to the original authority to reconsider the case after allowing the cross-examination of the Director of M/s Auspicious Ornaments. The Tribunal found no error in the direction given by the first appellate authority for remanding the matter, and hence, the appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
