Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
The High Court held that the petitioner bank should avail the alternate remedy of appeal u/s 15-T of the SEBI Act against SEBI's order dated January 11, 2023, instead of challenging SEBI's private communications expressing opinion on a legal provision through a writ petition. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) within four weeks, and directed the SAT to dispose of the appeal on merits without considering the limitation issue. All contentions of parties on merits were left open to be decided by the SAT.
The High Court held that the petitioner bank should avail the alternate remedy of appeal u/s 15-T of the SEBI Act against SEBI's order dated January 11, 2023, instead of challenging SEBI's private communications expressing opinion on a legal provision through a writ petition. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) within four weeks, and directed the SAT to dispose of the appeal on merits without considering the limitation issue. All contentions of parties on merits were left open to be decided by the SAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
