Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The High Court held that the petitioner bank should avail the alternate remedy of appeal u/s 15-T of the SEBI Act against SEBI's order dated January 11, 2023, instead of challenging SEBI's private communications expressing opinion on a legal provision through a writ petition. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) within four weeks, and directed the SAT to dispose of the appeal on merits without considering the limitation issue. All contentions of parties on merits were left open to be decided by the SAT.
The High Court held that the petitioner bank should avail the alternate remedy of appeal u/s 15-T of the SEBI Act against SEBI's order dated January 11, 2023, instead of challenging SEBI's private communications expressing opinion on a legal provision through a writ petition. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) within four weeks, and directed the SAT to dispose of the appeal on merits without considering the limitation issue. All contentions of parties on merits were left open to be decided by the SAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
