Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeals filed against the order of the Adjudicating Authority directing lenders to release Non-Fund Based (NFB) facilities as per the approved Resolution Plan. The NCLAT held that when a Resolution Plan is approved, it is obligatory for all stakeholders to act in a manner to implement it. Except Bank of Baroda, no other lender had issued bank guarantees or letters of credit, despite the Resolution Plan providing for roll-over of NFB facilities. The company, being an EPC contractor, requires NFB facilities to undertake contracts and generate revenue for repayment obligations under the Resolution Plan. Non-release of NFB limits would jeopardize the company's operations and impact repayment to assenting creditors. The NFB Agreement must be interpreted harmoniously with the Resolution Plan to give effect to its intent and not render its clauses unworkable.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeals filed against the order of the Adjudicating Authority directing lenders to release Non-Fund Based (NFB) facilities as per the approved Resolution Plan. The NCLAT held that when a Resolution Plan is approved, it is obligatory for all stakeholders to act in a manner to implement it. Except Bank of Baroda, no other lender had issued bank guarantees or letters of credit, despite the Resolution Plan providing for roll-over of NFB facilities. The company, being an EPC contractor, requires NFB facilities to undertake contracts and generate revenue for repayment obligations under the Resolution Plan. Non-release of NFB limits would jeopardize the company's operations and impact repayment to assenting creditors. The NFB Agreement must be interpreted harmoniously with the Resolution Plan to give effect to its intent and not render its clauses unworkable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
