Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeals filed against the order of the Adjudicating Authority directing lenders to release Non-Fund Based (NFB) facilities as per the approved Resolution Plan. The NCLAT held that when a Resolution Plan is approved, it is obligatory for all stakeholders to act in a manner to implement it. Except Bank of Baroda, no other lender had issued bank guarantees or letters of credit, despite the Resolution Plan providing for roll-over of NFB facilities. The company, being an EPC contractor, requires NFB facilities to undertake contracts and generate revenue for repayment obligations under the Resolution Plan. Non-release of NFB limits would jeopardize the company's operations and impact repayment to assenting creditors. The NFB Agreement must be interpreted harmoniously with the Resolution Plan to give effect to its intent and not render its clauses unworkable.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeals filed against the order of the Adjudicating Authority directing lenders to release Non-Fund Based (NFB) facilities as per the approved Resolution Plan. The NCLAT held that when a Resolution Plan is approved, it is obligatory for all stakeholders to act in a manner to implement it. Except Bank of Baroda, no other lender had issued bank guarantees or letters of credit, despite the Resolution Plan providing for roll-over of NFB facilities. The company, being an EPC contractor, requires NFB facilities to undertake contracts and generate revenue for repayment obligations under the Resolution Plan. Non-release of NFB limits would jeopardize the company's operations and impact repayment to assenting creditors. The NFB Agreement must be interpreted harmoniously with the Resolution Plan to give effect to its intent and not render its clauses unworkable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
