Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeals filed against the order of the Adjudicating Authority directing lenders to release Non-Fund Based (NFB) facilities as per the approved Resolution Plan. The NCLAT held that when a Resolution Plan is approved, it is obligatory for all stakeholders to act in a manner to implement it. Except Bank of Baroda, no other lender had issued bank guarantees or letters of credit, despite the Resolution Plan providing for roll-over of NFB facilities. The company, being an EPC contractor, requires NFB facilities to undertake contracts and generate revenue for repayment obligations under the Resolution Plan. Non-release of NFB limits would jeopardize the company's operations and impact repayment to assenting creditors. The NFB Agreement must be interpreted harmoniously with the Resolution Plan to give effect to its intent and not render its clauses unworkable.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeals filed against the order of the Adjudicating Authority directing lenders to release Non-Fund Based (NFB) facilities as per the approved Resolution Plan. The NCLAT held that when a Resolution Plan is approved, it is obligatory for all stakeholders to act in a manner to implement it. Except Bank of Baroda, no other lender had issued bank guarantees or letters of credit, despite the Resolution Plan providing for roll-over of NFB facilities. The company, being an EPC contractor, requires NFB facilities to undertake contracts and generate revenue for repayment obligations under the Resolution Plan. Non-release of NFB limits would jeopardize the company's operations and impact repayment to assenting creditors. The NFB Agreement must be interpreted harmoniously with the Resolution Plan to give effect to its intent and not render its clauses unworkable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
