Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand. The appellant was not entitled to the benefit of the fifth proviso to Rule 10 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 regarding inclusion of air freight up to 20% of FOB value in the assessable value. The Tribunal held that the amount shown as 'Add.Recov.Freight' in the invoices represented the air freight incurred by the appellant. Since the invoices were raised on CPT basis, the CPT value was considered the de facto FOB value. The addition of 'Add.Recov.Freight' amount in the assessable value was restricted to 20% of the CPT value. The matter was remanded to the original authority for re-determining the duty payable on all Bills of Entry accordingly.
The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand. The appellant was not entitled to the benefit of the fifth proviso to Rule 10 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 regarding inclusion of air freight up to 20% of FOB value in the assessable value. The Tribunal held that the amount shown as 'Add.Recov.Freight' in the invoices represented the air freight incurred by the appellant. Since the invoices were raised on CPT basis, the CPT value was considered the de facto FOB value. The addition of 'Add.Recov.Freight' amount in the assessable value was restricted to 20% of the CPT value. The matter was remanded to the original authority for re-determining the duty payable on all Bills of Entry accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.