Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand. The appellant was not entitled to the benefit of the fifth proviso to Rule 10 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 regarding inclusion of air freight up to 20% of FOB value in the assessable value. The Tribunal held that the amount shown as 'Add.Recov.Freight' in the invoices represented the air freight incurred by the appellant. Since the invoices were raised on CPT basis, the CPT value was considered the de facto FOB value. The addition of 'Add.Recov.Freight' amount in the assessable value was restricted to 20% of the CPT value. The matter was remanded to the original authority for re-determining the duty payable on all Bills of Entry accordingly.
The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand. The appellant was not entitled to the benefit of the fifth proviso to Rule 10 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 regarding inclusion of air freight up to 20% of FOB value in the assessable value. The Tribunal held that the amount shown as 'Add.Recov.Freight' in the invoices represented the air freight incurred by the appellant. Since the invoices were raised on CPT basis, the CPT value was considered the de facto FOB value. The addition of 'Add.Recov.Freight' amount in the assessable value was restricted to 20% of the CPT value. The matter was remanded to the original authority for re-determining the duty payable on all Bills of Entry accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.