Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
The High Court quashed the penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre against the petitioner without providing an opportunity of hearing. The matter was remanded back to pass a fresh penalty order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law, as the Tribunal had already granted substantial relief to the petitioner on merits in the appeals filed by both parties.
The High Court quashed the penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre against the petitioner without providing an opportunity of hearing. The matter was remanded back to pass a fresh penalty order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law, as the Tribunal had already granted substantial relief to the petitioner on merits in the appeals filed by both parties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.