Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The High Court quashed and set aside the Tribunal's order which had refused to condone the delay of 2208 days in filing the appeal. The High Court held that the Tribunal's finding that the order was delivered at the address mentioned in Form No. 35 was perverse and contrary to the record. The delay of 2208 days in preferring the appeal was condoned by the High Court, and the matter was remanded back to the Tribunal to be decided on merits.
The High Court quashed and set aside the Tribunal's order which had refused to condone the delay of 2208 days in filing the appeal. The High Court held that the Tribunal's finding that the order was delivered at the address mentioned in Form No. 35 was perverse and contrary to the record. The delay of 2208 days in preferring the appeal was condoned by the High Court, and the matter was remanded back to the Tribunal to be decided on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.