Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The High Court quashed and set aside the Tribunal's order which had refused to condone the delay of 2208 days in filing the appeal. The High Court held that the Tribunal's finding that the order was delivered at the address mentioned in Form No. 35 was perverse and contrary to the record. The delay of 2208 days in preferring the appeal was condoned by the High Court, and the matter was remanded back to the Tribunal to be decided on merits.
The High Court quashed and set aside the Tribunal's order which had refused to condone the delay of 2208 days in filing the appeal. The High Court held that the Tribunal's finding that the order was delivered at the address mentioned in Form No. 35 was perverse and contrary to the record. The delay of 2208 days in preferring the appeal was condoned by the High Court, and the matter was remanded back to the Tribunal to be decided on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.