Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The petitioner's transaction of sale of immovable property was complete in the assessment year (AY) 2005-06 through execution of agreement, receipt of consideration, and handing over possession, though the sale deed was registered in July 2008. As per Section 47 of the Registration Act, 1908, the sale deed relates back to AY 2005-06, not the date of registration. In AY 2006-07, neither sale nor registration occurred, precluding reassessment proceedings u/s 148 to determine capital gains. Consequently, the impugned order and notices were quashed by the High Court, holding that the correct assessment year was AY 2005-06 when the transaction was disclosed in the income tax returns.
The petitioner's transaction of sale of immovable property was complete in the assessment year (AY) 2005-06 through execution of agreement, receipt of consideration, and handing over possession, though the sale deed was registered in July 2008. As per Section 47 of the Registration Act, 1908, the sale deed relates back to AY 2005-06, not the date of registration. In AY 2006-07, neither sale nor registration occurred, precluding reassessment proceedings u/s 148 to determine capital gains. Consequently, the impugned order and notices were quashed by the High Court, holding that the correct assessment year was AY 2005-06 when the transaction was disclosed in the income tax returns.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
