Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The Tribunal upheld the validity of the approval granted u/s 153D of the Income Tax Act. It concurred with the CIT(A) that the normal practice of providing draft orders, assessment records, and relevant documents to the approving authority was followed. The assessee failed to demonstrate that these records were not provided to the approving authority. Consequently, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s findings regarding the jurisdictional issue of approval u/s 153D. Due to the absence of material on record, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 2012-13 without adjudicating the merits of the case.
The Tribunal upheld the validity of the approval granted u/s 153D of the Income Tax Act. It concurred with the CIT(A) that the normal practice of providing draft orders, assessment records, and relevant documents to the approving authority was followed. The assessee failed to demonstrate that these records were not provided to the approving authority. Consequently, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s findings regarding the jurisdictional issue of approval u/s 153D. Due to the absence of material on record, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 2012-13 without adjudicating the merits of the case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
