Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The Tribunal upheld the validity of the approval granted u/s 153D of the Income Tax Act. It concurred with the CIT(A) that the normal practice of providing draft orders, assessment records, and relevant documents to the approving authority was followed. The assessee failed to demonstrate that these records were not provided to the approving authority. Consequently, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s findings regarding the jurisdictional issue of approval u/s 153D. Due to the absence of material on record, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 2012-13 without adjudicating the merits of the case.
The Tribunal upheld the validity of the approval granted u/s 153D of the Income Tax Act. It concurred with the CIT(A) that the normal practice of providing draft orders, assessment records, and relevant documents to the approving authority was followed. The assessee failed to demonstrate that these records were not provided to the approving authority. Consequently, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s findings regarding the jurisdictional issue of approval u/s 153D. Due to the absence of material on record, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 2012-13 without adjudicating the merits of the case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
