Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the Assessing Officer to permit the deduction of bad debts claimed u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the authorities below misunderstood the facts and failed to appreciate the prevailing business scenario. Venturing into diverse sectors is common for large corporate houses. The assessee's investment in the subsidiary was part of its business, and after a long gestation period, the question of it not being part of the assessee's business was ruled out. The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court judgments to strengthen the assessee's case.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the Assessing Officer to permit the deduction of bad debts claimed u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the authorities below misunderstood the facts and failed to appreciate the prevailing business scenario. Venturing into diverse sectors is common for large corporate houses. The assessee's investment in the subsidiary was part of its business, and after a long gestation period, the question of it not being part of the assessee's business was ruled out. The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court judgments to strengthen the assessee's case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
