Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on the issue of disallowance of deduction u/s 80-IA. It held that the arm's length price for transfer of power from the captive power unit to the steel manufacturing unit should be the rate at which the State Electricity Board supplies power to industrial consumers, and not the rate at which it purchases power from suppliers. This is in line with the jurisdictional High Court's judgment in CIT v Godavari Power & Ispat Ltd and the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT v Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. Regarding the disallowance of deduction u/s 80G for donations, the ITAT restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after verifying whether the donations satisfied the conditions of section 80G. It also restored the connected issue of double disallowance of deduction u/s 80G to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on the issue of disallowance of deduction u/s 80-IA. It held that the arm's length price for transfer of power from the captive power unit to the steel manufacturing unit should be the rate at which the State Electricity Board supplies power to industrial consumers, and not the rate at which it purchases power from suppliers. This is in line with the jurisdictional High Court's judgment in CIT v Godavari Power & Ispat Ltd and the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT v Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. Regarding the disallowance of deduction u/s 80G for donations, the ITAT restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after verifying whether the donations satisfied the conditions of section 80G. It also restored the connected issue of double disallowance of deduction u/s 80G to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
