Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
The High Court held that the mid-year review and revision of Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) allocations conducted by the Respondents without affording an opportunity of hearing and sufficient prior notice to the Petitioners lacked specified criteria and was procedurally flawed. The Court directed the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) to examine the issues raised by the Petitioners and issue a fresh decision based on the review within three weeks, maintaining the current allocations until then. The petitions were disposed of.
The High Court held that the mid-year review and revision of Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) allocations conducted by the Respondents without affording an opportunity of hearing and sufficient prior notice to the Petitioners lacked specified criteria and was procedurally flawed. The Court directed the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) to examine the issues raised by the Petitioners and issue a fresh decision based on the review within three weeks, maintaining the current allocations until then. The petitions were disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
