Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The High Court held that the mid-year review and revision of Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) allocations conducted by the Respondents without affording an opportunity of hearing and sufficient prior notice to the Petitioners lacked specified criteria and was procedurally flawed. The Court directed the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) to examine the issues raised by the Petitioners and issue a fresh decision based on the review within three weeks, maintaining the current allocations until then. The petitions were disposed of.
The High Court held that the mid-year review and revision of Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) allocations conducted by the Respondents without affording an opportunity of hearing and sufficient prior notice to the Petitioners lacked specified criteria and was procedurally flawed. The Court directed the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) to examine the issues raised by the Petitioners and issue a fresh decision based on the review within three weeks, maintaining the current allocations until then. The petitions were disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
