Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the order of the Adjudicating Authority. The Appellant had informed the liquidator of its decision to relinquish its security interest, rendering Regulation 21A(1) inapplicable. As the Appellant proceeded to realize its security interest without paying the proportionate liquidation costs as per Regulations 21A(2) and (3), the Adjudicating Authority rightly held that the security interest stood relinquished. The Appellant had agreed for joint sale of assets by both liquidators but failed to pay the CIRP and liquidation costs. The NCLAT found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the order of the Adjudicating Authority. The Appellant had informed the liquidator of its decision to relinquish its security interest, rendering Regulation 21A(1) inapplicable. As the Appellant proceeded to realize its security interest without paying the proportionate liquidation costs as per Regulations 21A(2) and (3), the Adjudicating Authority rightly held that the security interest stood relinquished. The Appellant had agreed for joint sale of assets by both liquidators but failed to pay the CIRP and liquidation costs. The NCLAT found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
