Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL) should be excluded from the comparable list as they were functionally not comparable to the assessee, following the binding order of the Coordinate Bench of ITAT, Mumbai. However, the ITAT directed the Transfer Pricing Officer/Assessing Officer to include three other companies (ICRA, Cyber, and ITIL) in the list of comparables and calculate the arm's length price accordingly, as they were functionally similar to the assessee, in line with the orders of the coordinate benches of ITAT-Mumbai.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL) should be excluded from the comparable list as they were functionally not comparable to the assessee, following the binding order of the Coordinate Bench of ITAT, Mumbai. However, the ITAT directed the Transfer Pricing Officer/Assessing Officer to include three other companies (ICRA, Cyber, and ITIL) in the list of comparables and calculate the arm's length price accordingly, as they were functionally similar to the assessee, in line with the orders of the coordinate benches of ITAT-Mumbai.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
