Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The High Court held that the order passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) u/ss 143(3)/254/144B of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it lacked jurisdiction. The Revenue failed to file a counter-affidavit despite being granted multiple opportunities. The Court accepted the petitioner's uncontested facts that the assessment proceedings had concluded with the order dated 04.02.2023, giving effect to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's directions. Initiating further proceedings by the NFAC after passing the assessment order was without jurisdiction, as concluded assessments cannot be reopened except through specific statutory provisions like Section 147 of the Act.
The High Court held that the order passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) u/ss 143(3)/254/144B of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it lacked jurisdiction. The Revenue failed to file a counter-affidavit despite being granted multiple opportunities. The Court accepted the petitioner's uncontested facts that the assessment proceedings had concluded with the order dated 04.02.2023, giving effect to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's directions. Initiating further proceedings by the NFAC after passing the assessment order was without jurisdiction, as concluded assessments cannot be reopened except through specific statutory provisions like Section 147 of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
