Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be compensatory and capital in nature, thus not liable to be included in the total income. Consequently, no penalty was leviable u/s 271(1)(c) on the amount allowed in favor of the assessee. Regarding the initiation of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for income from capital gains and other sources with intent to avoid taxes, the Calcutta High Court held that when the assessing officer recorded concealed/undisclosed income in the assessment order and initiated penalty proceedings, the consequent notice u/s 274 complied with natural justice principles, dismissing the related ground of appeal. On the penalty for returned income, relying on judicial precedents, if the compensation amount is excluded as a capital receipt, there remains no difference between returned and assessed income, rendering the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposable, allowing the related grounds of appeal and directing penalty deletion.
The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be compensatory and capital in nature, thus not liable to be included in the total income. Consequently, no penalty was leviable u/s 271(1)(c) on the amount allowed in favor of the assessee. Regarding the initiation of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for income from capital gains and other sources with intent to avoid taxes, the Calcutta High Court held that when the assessing officer recorded concealed/undisclosed income in the assessment order and initiated penalty proceedings, the consequent notice u/s 274 complied with natural justice principles, dismissing the related ground of appeal. On the penalty for returned income, relying on judicial precedents, if the compensation amount is excluded as a capital receipt, there remains no difference between returned and assessed income, rendering the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposable, allowing the related grounds of appeal and directing penalty deletion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.