Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be compensatory and capital in nature, thus not liable to be included in the total income. Consequently, no penalty was leviable u/s 271(1)(c) on the amount allowed in favor of the assessee. Regarding the initiation of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for income from capital gains and other sources with intent to avoid taxes, the Calcutta High Court held that when the assessing officer recorded concealed/undisclosed income in the assessment order and initiated penalty proceedings, the consequent notice u/s 274 complied with natural justice principles, dismissing the related ground of appeal. On the penalty for returned income, relying on judicial precedents, if the compensation amount is excluded as a capital receipt, there remains no difference between returned and assessed income, rendering the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposable, allowing the related grounds of appeal and directing penalty deletion.
The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be compensatory and capital in nature, thus not liable to be included in the total income. Consequently, no penalty was leviable u/s 271(1)(c) on the amount allowed in favor of the assessee. Regarding the initiation of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for income from capital gains and other sources with intent to avoid taxes, the Calcutta High Court held that when the assessing officer recorded concealed/undisclosed income in the assessment order and initiated penalty proceedings, the consequent notice u/s 274 complied with natural justice principles, dismissing the related ground of appeal. On the penalty for returned income, relying on judicial precedents, if the compensation amount is excluded as a capital receipt, there remains no difference between returned and assessed income, rendering the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposable, allowing the related grounds of appeal and directing penalty deletion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
