Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority violated principles of natural justice by failing to consider rival contentions and assign reasons for either accepting or rejecting arguments while granting an interim order u/ss 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLAT allowed the appellant to file a stay vacation application before the Adjudicating Authority within one week. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to decide the stay vacation application within three weeks, considering all contentions and assigning reasons for granting or denying the interim order. The observations made by the NCLAT or the impugned order were not to influence the decision on the stay vacation application.
The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority violated principles of natural justice by failing to consider rival contentions and assign reasons for either accepting or rejecting arguments while granting an interim order u/ss 241/242 of the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLAT allowed the appellant to file a stay vacation application before the Adjudicating Authority within one week. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to decide the stay vacation application within three weeks, considering all contentions and assigning reasons for granting or denying the interim order. The observations made by the NCLAT or the impugned order were not to influence the decision on the stay vacation application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
