Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the orders of provisional attachment and its confirmation. The accused were discharged from the predicate offence by the Competent Court, and the order attained finality in the absence of a challenge. Since the accused were discharged from the scheduled offence, the impugned orders of provisional attachment and its confirmation could not be sustained under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The attachment of properties belonging to the accused and their entities was questioned, and the Tribunal accepted the argument that when the accused were discharged from the predicate offence, the orders of provisional attachment could not be upheld.
The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the orders of provisional attachment and its confirmation. The accused were discharged from the predicate offence by the Competent Court, and the order attained finality in the absence of a challenge. Since the accused were discharged from the scheduled offence, the impugned orders of provisional attachment and its confirmation could not be sustained under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The attachment of properties belonging to the accused and their entities was questioned, and the Tribunal accepted the argument that when the accused were discharged from the predicate offence, the orders of provisional attachment could not be upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
