Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
The Tribunal held that the appellant rightly issued credit notes to government entities that refused payment of consideration and service tax, allowing adjustment of service tax already paid as per Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The demand of Rs.38,74,883/- service tax was set aside as unsustainable. Regarding exemption from service tax for services provided to the Consulate of Belgium, the Tribunal found the appellant had not suppressed facts and the demand was time-barred, allowing the appeal.
The Tribunal held that the appellant rightly issued credit notes to government entities that refused payment of consideration and service tax, allowing adjustment of service tax already paid as per Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The demand of Rs.38,74,883/- service tax was set aside as unsustainable. Regarding exemption from service tax for services provided to the Consulate of Belgium, the Tribunal found the appellant had not suppressed facts and the demand was time-barred, allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
