Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court disposed of the petitioner's appeal challenging the impugned order and consequent summary of demand in Form GST APL-04. The court held that the petitioners may file an appeal once the president or state president of the appellate tribunal constituted u/s 107 of the Act of 2017 assumes office. Subject to depositing 20% of the remaining disputed tax amount, if not already deposited, in addition to the earlier deposit u/s 107(6) of the BGST Act, the petitioner must be granted the statutory benefit of stay u/s 112(9) of the BGST Act. The petitioner cannot be deprived of this benefit due to the respondents' failure to constitute the tribunal.
The High Court disposed of the petitioner's appeal challenging the impugned order and consequent summary of demand in Form GST APL-04. The court held that the petitioners may file an appeal once the president or state president of the appellate tribunal constituted u/s 107 of the Act of 2017 assumes office. Subject to depositing 20% of the remaining disputed tax amount, if not already deposited, in addition to the earlier deposit u/s 107(6) of the BGST Act, the petitioner must be granted the statutory benefit of stay u/s 112(9) of the BGST Act. The petitioner cannot be deprived of this benefit due to the respondents' failure to constitute the tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
