Business deductions and transfer pricing issues: tribunal treatment of software write-offs, donation receipts, warranty provisions, and related expens...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2921 to 2940 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that R.V. Hydraulic Services is not eligible to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) paid for the imported machinery (Davi Full Hydraulic Plate Roll). The Bill of Entry was in the name of M/s Promau SRL, C/o IMTEX, and not in the name of the applicant. As per Section 16(2)(a) read with Rule 36(1)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017 and Section 20 of the IGST Act, a valid Bill of Entry in the recipient's name is a prerequisite to claim ITC on imported goods. Since the essential documentary requirement was not fulfilled, the applicant's claim for ITC was denied.
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that R.V. Hydraulic Services is not eligible to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) paid for the imported machinery (Davi Full Hydraulic Plate Roll). The Bill of Entry was in the name of M/s Promau SRL, C/o IMTEX, and not in the name of the applicant. As per Section 16(2)(a) read with Rule 36(1)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017 and Section 20 of the IGST Act, a valid Bill of Entry in the recipient's name is a prerequisite to claim ITC on imported goods. Since the essential documentary requirement was not fulfilled, the applicant's claim for ITC was denied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
