Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The Tribunal held that the assessee's cash deposits during the demonetization period were from sale proceeds and collections from sundry debtors/trade debtors. The assessee maintained proper books of accounts subjected to tax audit, and the sales were reflected and offered to tax. Adding the same again would amount to impermissible double taxation. The assessee discharged the burden of proving the source of the cash deposited, and the authorities failed to rebut it. The Tribunal found no prohibition on dealing with Specified Bank Notes until December 31, 2016, under the Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2017. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The Tribunal held that the assessee's cash deposits during the demonetization period were from sale proceeds and collections from sundry debtors/trade debtors. The assessee maintained proper books of accounts subjected to tax audit, and the sales were reflected and offered to tax. Adding the same again would amount to impermissible double taxation. The assessee discharged the burden of proving the source of the cash deposited, and the authorities failed to rebut it. The Tribunal found no prohibition on dealing with Specified Bank Notes until December 31, 2016, under the Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2017. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.