Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The Tribunal held that the assessee's cash deposits during the demonetization period were from sale proceeds and collections from sundry debtors/trade debtors. The assessee maintained proper books of accounts subjected to tax audit, and the sales were reflected and offered to tax. Adding the same again would amount to impermissible double taxation. The assessee discharged the burden of proving the source of the cash deposited, and the authorities failed to rebut it. The Tribunal found no prohibition on dealing with Specified Bank Notes until December 31, 2016, under the Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2017. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The Tribunal held that the assessee's cash deposits during the demonetization period were from sale proceeds and collections from sundry debtors/trade debtors. The assessee maintained proper books of accounts subjected to tax audit, and the sales were reflected and offered to tax. Adding the same again would amount to impermissible double taxation. The assessee discharged the burden of proving the source of the cash deposited, and the authorities failed to rebut it. The Tribunal found no prohibition on dealing with Specified Bank Notes until December 31, 2016, under the Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2017. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.