Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court directed the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to amend the shipping bills u/s 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, and process the claim for the Merchandise Exports From India Scheme (MEIS) benefit. The court held that when the substantive conditions are satisfied, the benefit cannot be denied due to a technical error or lacunae in the electronic system. The petitioner's non-declaration of intent to avail the MEIS benefit on the shipping bills was a curable defect, and the authorities were unjustified in denying the MEIS benefit. The petition was disposed of in favor of the petitioner.
The High Court directed the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to amend the shipping bills u/s 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, and process the claim for the Merchandise Exports From India Scheme (MEIS) benefit. The court held that when the substantive conditions are satisfied, the benefit cannot be denied due to a technical error or lacunae in the electronic system. The petitioner's non-declaration of intent to avail the MEIS benefit on the shipping bills was a curable defect, and the authorities were unjustified in denying the MEIS benefit. The petition was disposed of in favor of the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
