Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the imported machinery "Innopet Plasmax System 20Q" used for coating PET bottles for aerating beverages/aerated waters is appropriately classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 8422 3000, and its parts under CTI 8422 9090 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Customs classifying the goods under CTI 8479 8999, allowing the appeals in favor of the appellants.
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the imported machinery "Innopet Plasmax System 20Q" used for coating PET bottles for aerating beverages/aerated waters is appropriately classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 8422 3000, and its parts under CTI 8422 9090 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Customs classifying the goods under CTI 8479 8999, allowing the appeals in favor of the appellants.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
