Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The High Court held that the Execution Application filed by the Applicant against the Respondent does not survive due to the approved Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). As per the Supreme Court's ruling in Ghanshyam Mishra case, once a Resolution Plan is approved by the Adjudicating Authority u/s 31(1) of the IBC, all claims not part of the Resolution Plan stand extinguished. No proceedings can be initiated or continued for claims not included in the approved Resolution Plan. The Respondent's Resolution Plan was approved by NCLT on March 5, 2020, and upheld by NCLAT on July 6, 2023. The Applicant's claim, being an operational creditor's claim prior to the Resolution Plan approval date, is entitled to NIL payment under paragraph 27 of the approved Plan. Therefore, the claim stands rejected and extinguished, rendering the Execution Application infructuous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the Execution Application and connected Notice.
The High Court held that the Execution Application filed by the Applicant against the Respondent does not survive due to the approved Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). As per the Supreme Court's ruling in Ghanshyam Mishra case, once a Resolution Plan is approved by the Adjudicating Authority u/s 31(1) of the IBC, all claims not part of the Resolution Plan stand extinguished. No proceedings can be initiated or continued for claims not included in the approved Resolution Plan. The Respondent's Resolution Plan was approved by NCLT on March 5, 2020, and upheld by NCLAT on July 6, 2023. The Applicant's claim, being an operational creditor's claim prior to the Resolution Plan approval date, is entitled to NIL payment under paragraph 27 of the approved Plan. Therefore, the claim stands rejected and extinguished, rendering the Execution Application infructuous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the Execution Application and connected Notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
