Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment, reliable financial data, and careful review of working capital and receivables adjustmen...
Transfer pricing rules require benchmarking corporate guarantees and associated-enterprise advances, while invalid domestic-transaction adjustments ca...
Prospective sugar export prohibition required registered letters of credit; private contracts and export quotas created no enforceable continuation ri...
Retroactive interim-moratorium exclusion permits protective asset disclosure and preservation measures against personal guarantors pending arbitration...
The High Court held that the Execution Application filed by the Applicant against the Respondent does not survive due to the approved Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). As per the Supreme Court's ruling in Ghanshyam Mishra case, once a Resolution Plan is approved by the Adjudicating Authority u/s 31(1) of the IBC, all claims not part of the Resolution Plan stand extinguished. No proceedings can be initiated or continued for claims not included in the approved Resolution Plan. The Respondent's Resolution Plan was approved by NCLT on March 5, 2020, and upheld by NCLAT on July 6, 2023. The Applicant's claim, being an operational creditor's claim prior to the Resolution Plan approval date, is entitled to NIL payment under paragraph 27 of the approved Plan. Therefore, the claim stands rejected and extinguished, rendering the Execution Application infructuous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the Execution Application and connected Notice.
The High Court held that the Execution Application filed by the Applicant against the Respondent does not survive due to the approved Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). As per the Supreme Court's ruling in Ghanshyam Mishra case, once a Resolution Plan is approved by the Adjudicating Authority u/s 31(1) of the IBC, all claims not part of the Resolution Plan stand extinguished. No proceedings can be initiated or continued for claims not included in the approved Resolution Plan. The Respondent's Resolution Plan was approved by NCLT on March 5, 2020, and upheld by NCLAT on July 6, 2023. The Applicant's claim, being an operational creditor's claim prior to the Resolution Plan approval date, is entitled to NIL payment under paragraph 27 of the approved Plan. Therefore, the claim stands rejected and extinguished, rendering the Execution Application infructuous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the Execution Application and connected Notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
