Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The High Court rejected the application for grant of regular bail filed by the applicant accused of offences u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and Sections 7 & 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 relating to a liquor scam and money laundering case. The Court observed that economic offences are grave, affecting the country's economy, involving huge loss of public funds posing a serious threat to financial health. The applicant played a pivotal role in facilitating payment of bribes to criminal syndicates involved in extorting illegal commissions and unauthorized sale of liquor causing an estimated Rs.1660 crore loss to the state exchequer. Considering the severity of offences, gravity of accusations, ongoing investigation and the Supreme Court's view on corruption being an enemy of the nation, the Court opined release on regular bail was not proper.
The High Court rejected the application for grant of regular bail filed by the applicant accused of offences u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and Sections 7 & 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 relating to a liquor scam and money laundering case. The Court observed that economic offences are grave, affecting the country's economy, involving huge loss of public funds posing a serious threat to financial health. The applicant played a pivotal role in facilitating payment of bribes to criminal syndicates involved in extorting illegal commissions and unauthorized sale of liquor causing an estimated Rs.1660 crore loss to the state exchequer. Considering the severity of offences, gravity of accusations, ongoing investigation and the Supreme Court's view on corruption being an enemy of the nation, the Court opined release on regular bail was not proper.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.