Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
The High Court disposed of the petition, holding that the rejection of the petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR Scheme) on the ground that redemption fine is not covered by the Scheme was contrary to the Court's previous decision. The Court ruled that once the petitioner's application under the SVLDR Scheme accepting payment of excise duty is accepted, the declarant is immune from imposition of any redemption fine, and the benefit of the Scheme extends to the redemption fine as well. Consequently, the ground for rejection was held to be bad in law.
The High Court disposed of the petition, holding that the rejection of the petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR Scheme) on the ground that redemption fine is not covered by the Scheme was contrary to the Court's previous decision. The Court ruled that once the petitioner's application under the SVLDR Scheme accepting payment of excise duty is accepted, the declarant is immune from imposition of any redemption fine, and the benefit of the Scheme extends to the redemption fine as well. Consequently, the ground for rejection was held to be bad in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
