Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The High Court dismissed the writ petition. The petitioner failed to file GSTR-3B returns and discharge the tax liability, despite having self-assessed and filed GSTR-1. The court held there was no scope for exercising discretion by extending the payment period, as the petitioner ought to have filed GSTR-3B and paid the tax. Furthermore, more than two years had elapsed since the impugned order dated 13.04.2022, providing ample time for the petitioner to pay the amount during the pendency of the writ petition.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition. The petitioner failed to file GSTR-3B returns and discharge the tax liability, despite having self-assessed and filed GSTR-1. The court held there was no scope for exercising discretion by extending the payment period, as the petitioner ought to have filed GSTR-3B and paid the tax. Furthermore, more than two years had elapsed since the impugned order dated 13.04.2022, providing ample time for the petitioner to pay the amount during the pendency of the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
