Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3481 to 3500 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition. The petitioner failed to file GSTR-3B returns and discharge the tax liability, despite having self-assessed and filed GSTR-1. The court held there was no scope for exercising discretion by extending the payment period, as the petitioner ought to have filed GSTR-3B and paid the tax. Furthermore, more than two years had elapsed since the impugned order dated 13.04.2022, providing ample time for the petitioner to pay the amount during the pendency of the writ petition.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition. The petitioner failed to file GSTR-3B returns and discharge the tax liability, despite having self-assessed and filed GSTR-1. The court held there was no scope for exercising discretion by extending the payment period, as the petitioner ought to have filed GSTR-3B and paid the tax. Furthermore, more than two years had elapsed since the impugned order dated 13.04.2022, providing ample time for the petitioner to pay the amount during the pendency of the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
