Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held that the NOIDA-II unit was entitled to deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act for its profits and gains derived from the NOIDA-I unit. The court applied the principles of consistency and certainty in taxation, stating that once the Revenue accepts the findings in favor of the assessee in the initial year(s), it cannot be re-agitated on the same set of facts in subsequent years without any change in circumstances or new facts. Regarding transfer pricing adjustment, the court ruled that the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) should be applied at the enterprise level, considering the singularity of the agreement between the associated enterprises and the interlacing of funds and unity of management. The court decided in favor of the assessee on the issue of crystallization and accrual of liability towards payroll taxes, holding that the liability arose when the reconciliation was conducted at the end of the Australian tax year.
The High Court held that the NOIDA-II unit was entitled to deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act for its profits and gains derived from the NOIDA-I unit. The court applied the principles of consistency and certainty in taxation, stating that once the Revenue accepts the findings in favor of the assessee in the initial year(s), it cannot be re-agitated on the same set of facts in subsequent years without any change in circumstances or new facts. Regarding transfer pricing adjustment, the court ruled that the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) should be applied at the enterprise level, considering the singularity of the agreement between the associated enterprises and the interlacing of funds and unity of management. The court decided in favor of the assessee on the issue of crystallization and accrual of liability towards payroll taxes, holding that the liability arose when the reconciliation was conducted at the end of the Australian tax year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.